docimprint

Comparisons

How DocImprint compares to parsers, scrapers, verifiable agent memory, and interaction-receipt protocols — plus a breakdown of every extract mode.

How does DocImprint compare to Firecrawl?

Firecrawl returns Markdown chunks without cryptographic proof of capture. DocImprint returns tamper-evident evidence bundles with manifest SHA-256, EIP-191 signatures, free offline verify, and x402 USDC pay-per-call for agents.

How does DocImprint compare to LlamaParse?

LlamaParse returns structured JSON with optional citations but no tamper detection. DocImprint binds captures to SHA-256 manifests, supports legal hold, on-chain notarization, and Merkle citation proofs verifiable offline.

How is DocImprint different from verifiable agent memory (VerifiedState, Engram)?

VerifiedState and Engram are tamper-evident memory stores for agent beliefs and session knowledge. DocImprint captures PDFs and URLs into signed evidence bundles with Merkle-cited answers you can verify offline — document capture, not a general memory graph.

How is DocImprint different from PEAC or similar evidence-bundle protocols?

PEAC and similar systems sign interaction or settlement receipts (what tools ran, what was paid). DocImprint signs document captures and proves which source paragraphs support each claim. Same vocabulary; different object of proof.

When should I use DocImprint instead of a scraper or parser?

Use DocImprint when agents or auditors must prove what a document said at capture time — legal, finance, compliance, and research workflows. Use scrapers for bulk Markdown when proof is not required. Closest parse tools are complements, not always replacements.

DocImprint vs Firecrawl vs LlamaParse

The core difference: only DocImprint produces cryptographic proof that a document has not been modified since capture.

FirecrawlLlamaParseDocImprint
OutputMarkdown chunksStructured JSONEvidence bundle + hashes
ProofNoneOptional citationsFree offline verify
Agent payAPI keysAPI keysx402 USDC + API keys
VerifyFree offline + on-chain

Firecrawl and LlamaParse are excellent tools for chunking and parsing. They do not produce cryptographic evidence or support agent-native x402 USDC payments.

Extract modes — input, output, and price

Every mode is a single POST /v1/extract call. Mix lean and bundle per request.

ModeOutputPrice
Bundle (default)Artifacts + manifest + hashes$0.075
LeanText only$0.010
Summarize3-sentence summary + key points$0.018
Q&AAnswer + citations$0.022
Claim-checksupported / contradicted / not_found + evidence$0.025
TranslateFull translated document$0.040
StructuredExtracted fields + citations$0.025
NotarizeOn-chain Base L2 tx hash$0.050
Verify, download, history, signing keys, and all GET endpoints are free.

Detailed comparisons

Long-tail pages with verification-focused differentiators — each with unique pricing and proof columns.

Related